Comments for code praxis http://codepraxis.com turning coffee into code Mon, 24 May 2010 18:34:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Compiling GibberMonkey by Yiivon http://codepraxis.com/2007/06/18/compiling-gibbermonkey/#comment-26 Mon, 24 May 2010 18:34:51 +0000 /post/2007/06/18/Compiling-GibberMonkey.aspx#comment-26 Good job!
These days, i am working at the js script sampling and i found that our project that as a anti-virus tool, i need a simple and implementable executive, that can, a tech. refer to the spidemonkey…
Um, you are great!!

]]> Comment on Core spidermonkey-dotnet Source Now LGPL by Anonymous http://codepraxis.com/2007/05/02/core-spidermonkey-dotnet-source-now-lgpl/#comment-25 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:14:15 +0000 /post/2007/05/02/Core-spidermonkey-dotnet-Source-Now-LGPL.aspx#comment-25 thanks for your hard works.

dual license will help it more popular

]]> Comment on GibberMonkey 0.1.0 by dpetillo http://codepraxis.com/2006/10/30/gibbermonkey-0-1-0/#comment-16 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:12:43 +0000 /post/2006/10/30/GibberMonkey-010.aspx#comment-16 Jonah, let me know what changeset or release your working with. Or send some source to my email address.

]]> Comment on GibberMonkey 0.1.0 by Jonah http://codepraxis.com/2006/10/30/gibbermonkey-0-1-0/#comment-15 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:12:24 +0000 /post/2006/10/30/GibberMonkey-010.aspx#comment-15 It would appear that the delegate handling is now broken :(

I tried this with the TestFire method of the Shell class in the smnet-shell project, and although stepping through the code shows me that the _xyz event handler is of the correct type, it still does nothing.

I will continue to delve into this issue, but I am desperately hoping that you will provide some words of wisdom that I can use in my efforts to make the callback functions… functional :)

]]> Comment on GibberMonkey 0.1.0 by Anonymous http://codepraxis.com/2006/10/30/gibbermonkey-0-1-0/#comment-14 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:11:58 +0000 /post/2006/10/30/GibberMonkey-010.aspx#comment-14 Great stuff. Love the name too!

]]> Comment on spidermonkey-dotnet 0.1.1 by dpetillo http://codepraxis.com/2006/09/01/spidermonkey-dotnet-0-1-1/#comment-5 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:05:33 +0000 /post/2006/09/01/spidermonkey-dotnet-011.aspx#comment-5 I originally had an idea for a program that gave the users access to a server-side interpreter. I had a lot of success with SpiderMonkey and C++, but wanted to move to .Net because I find coding with it much faster.

Now the only option for embedding script provided by Microsoft is the VSA engine. This API would force the user to write an entire class, that would basically be just compiled on the fly. Have to implement a whole interface was way off from what I needed, plus JIT’ing lots of small scripts seemed like a lot of overhead. And then what about the security of these scripts? I still can’t find a real .Net interpreter.

But your also right, P/Invoke and SpiderMonkey are both too cool to ignore.

Did you have a good test bed for your Delphi binding? My core binding exposes a lot of API and I haven’t verified they all work well. Otherwise I should have source control working over on codeplex.com soon if you’d like to help out.

]]> Comment on spidermonkey-dotnet 0.1.1 by Mister Fingers http://codepraxis.com/2006/09/01/spidermonkey-dotnet-0-1-1/#comment-4 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:05:11 +0000 /post/2006/09/01/spidermonkey-dotnet-011.aspx#comment-4 This is pretty cool stuff, I did a Delphi binding for spidermonkey a long time ago. If I can be of any help let me know.

I’m just wondering why you are doing it though? Learning pinvoke? Why not use Microsoft.JScript?

Just curious, good work!

]]>